News & Articles
Conflict at Work - The Hidden Costs of Poorly Managed Organizational Conflict
Sunday, 15 March 2009 21:20
By Tammy Lenski, Ed.D
Conflict in organizations is not a problem. Well managed conflict contributes to creativity, strategic initiative, more effective systems and communication, stronger workplace relationships and greater commitment to the organization. Organizations shouldn't attempt to prevent conflict, but should instead focus energy on preventing unresolved or destructive conflict.
Left unresolved or escalating destructively, conflict is expensive, both in financial and human terms. Some conflict costs are easily measured, such as legal fees and losses associated with theft and sabotage. Conflict that escalates so far as to damage an organization's reputation is measurable in terms of lower earnings or diminished market share.
The hidden costs of conflict can be more significant to the bottom line and the overall health of the organization. Here are a few of the most common conflict costs that are overlooked by managers:
Time and salary loss. Studies over the last decade suggest that between 30% and 40% of a manager's time is spent dealing with employee conflict and helping employees reach agreement. In a study I conducted in 2000, managers' time on conflict ranged more commonly from 40% to 50% of work hours. The total amount of time spent on a conflict and away from other work typically includes the time of the employees involved, the manager to whom those employees report, and in larger organizations, the human resources manager and legal counsel. It adds up quickly.
Attrition. Research reported in the late 1990s showed that workplace conflict left unresolved for too long leads to team members leaving the company or using valuable work time searching for alternative employment. Employee turnover due to conflict results in severance costs, recruitment costs, training and development costs, and loss of productivity during that period.
Absenteeism and health care expenditures. The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine has reported that health care costs are nearly 50% greater for workers who report high levels of stress. Stress as a reason for absenteeism increased 316% between 1995 and 1999 and studies suggest that it is a common byproduct of unhealthy workplace conflict.
Grievances and related complaints. Between 1992 and 1998, annual monetary benefits for EEOC sexual harassment cases increased from $12.7 to $34.5 million. Annual monetary benefits for EEOC-handled ADA cases increased from $200,000 to $49.1 million during the same period. Neither of these figures includes monetary benefits obtained through litigation.
Copyright © 2004 by Tammy Lenski. All rights reserved.
Dr. Tammy Lenski teaches individuals and groups how to untangle disagreements and build dynamic personal and professional partnerships by engaging conflict effectively.
In successful private practice since 1997, Tammy has taught mediation and conflict resolution to hundreds of bachelor's, master's and doctoral students; trained workplace teams throughout the U.S.; coached executives, senior teams and couples in the art of effective conflict resolution; and mediated complex business, probate and workplace disputes in organizations large and small.
Her book, "Making Mediation Your Day Job," was released in January 2008 and is available at all major online booksellers. Tammy writes extensively about conflict, coaching, and resolution at Conflict Zen, where you can find over 400 articles to jump-start your own dialogues at work and home, and where you can get a complimentary copy of Talking It Out in Ten, Tammy's worksheet and guide to help you think and prepare for your difficult conversations.
Article Source: Tammy Lenski Ezine Articles
Benefits of ADR Or Alternative Dispute Resolution
Sunday, 15 March 2009 21:08
By Jeffrey FrankAs anyone with even a passing knowledge of the legal system knows, going to trial is time consuming, expensive, and risky. This risk applies to both sides engaged in a legal dispute. As a result, ADR or, alternative dispute resolution, has become an effective and leading method for parties involved in a lawsuit to attempt to resolve their grievances before moving to trial. ADR typically takes one of two forms. Those two forms are arbitration or mediation.
In an arbitration hearing each side presents their case, often in short hand form to an independent hearing officer, or arbitrator, who will render a decision. As with a trial there will be a winner and a loser. If the arbitration is "non-binding" then either side may choose to reject the award and continue forward on towards trial. If the arbitration is "binding" then both sides accept the decision of the arbitrator.
A mediation hearing entails both sides appearing before an impartial hearing officer or mediator who will attempt to resolve the case. Typically both sides will meet with the mediator at the mediator's office. Each side, including both the attorneys and their clients, will be situated in separate offices (often in a personal injury case where an insurance company is involved on behalf of their insured the insurance adjustor will participate in the personal injury mediation without the defendant present). The mediator then moves between both parties conveying offers and counter offers. As well, the mediator will advise each side on the strengths and weaknesses of their respective case and the appropriateness of the offers and counter offers based upon the actual facts of the case. Mediation has proven to be extremely effective in resolving personal injury cases. Mediation saves both parties in a legal dispute time, money, and provides a clear and authoritative result. Often this proves to be a more attractive solution to the parties than the time, expense, and substantial risk involved with going through a trial.
With all of this said, mediation is clearly not suitable in all cases. Often the parties are simply too far apart in terms of the facts, issues, and amount in dispute to make mediation a worthwhile undertaking for that particular personal injury case. As an injury attorney, my own experience is that mediation is almost always worth attempting. It's "worth a try" to get the case settled, in less time and with a lower amount of stress involved. In the case where a settlement is not reached, one often learns valuable information about the facts and contentions as the other side sees them. To the personal injury victim I would suggest discussing alternative dispute resolution with your lawyer to see if this can be an effective tool in helping to resolve your particular case. San Diego personal injury attorney Jeffrey Frank has been representing accident and injury clients since 1985. As an injury attorney in San Diego, Jeffrey R. Frank offers legal services for injury victims throughout Southern California.
Article Source: Jeffrey Frank, EzineArticles.com
Last Updated ( Sunday, 15 March 2009 21:17 )


